Industry Solution
SLM prints conformal-cooling inserts (finished on 5-axis CNC afterward); FGF pellet extrusion prints large master-mold patterns in one piece; 5-axis and gantry CNC handle cavity finishing — the three stages cover the full mold workflow.
Industry Challenges
Recommended Equipment
From metal powder to pellet extrusion to precision CNC — these machines cover every stage of the modern mold workflow.

Same build volume as NZ-FGF-800, specified for high temperature: heated chamber to 100°C, 450°C nozzle, 25kg dryer and pneumatic feeding. CNC motion controller for 7×24 running; absolute-encoder servos for power-loss resume.
Build: 800×600×800mm · chamber 100°C · PPS-CF / PA-CF

Large polymer-composite pellet printer — 2400mm travel, high-flow screw (≤10kg/h). 4-meter sculptures, automotive master molds, GFRP replacements.
Build: 2400mm class · up to 10kg/h

Mid-large FGF — 1800mm travel, high-flow screw extrusion; large sculptures, display props, master molds.
Build: 1800mm class · high-flow screw

Mid-size polymer-composite pellet printer — 1200×1000×1000mm, 1–8mm nozzle 3-zone heating, 40kg hopper integrated feeder, single-phase 220V, 950kg.
Build: 1200×1000×1000mm · 220V · PLA to PEEK+CF

Polymer-composite pellet printer — 800×600×800mm, 0.4–3mm nozzle, 2-zone heating, 12kg hopper, optional chamber heating. General-purpose for PLA to PEEK+CF.
Build: 800×600×800mm · PLA to PEEK+CF pellets

Large polymer-composite additive+subtractive machine — 3000×2000×1000mm build & mill, 4–12mm nozzle 4-zone heating, 30kg/h max flow, 200kg tri-feeder, zoned aluminum bed ≤120°C, 70kW.
Build: 3000×2000×1000mm · up to 30kg/h · hybrid

FGF pellet 3D mold-printing machine — screw-extruded composite pellets print large industrial molds, 3000×2000×1000mm build, integrated dual-unit 100kg feeder, 6000kg.
Build: 3000×2000×1000mm · 6000kg · industrial molds

Quad-laser same-format large metal printer — 625×625×1100mm build, 7×24h unattended auto powder feed, 3× efficiency.
Build: 625×625×1100mm · 4 lasers · SLM
Real-World Applications
FAQ
Yes, wherever conformal cooling matters — it typically cuts injection cycle time 15–30%. For simple straight-line cooling channels, conventional machining is still more economical.
It depends on wall thickness and cooling-path design; real projects commonly see a 15–30% cycle-time reduction. Send us the part drawing for a project-specific estimate.
Prototype validation is available from a single piece. For production inserts, we recommend evaluating the full mold's cooling layout at once to amortize cost.
Yes — we can reverse-scan an existing mold or part and redesign the cooling layout from there.
Send a brief description — we'll reply within one business day with an equipment & process recommendation.
Contact Us →